Home

Advertisement

More Than A Game

  • Nov. 9th, 2009 at 10:48 PM
 

SPOILER ALERT: I'll try to deviate from the normal movie review.

Read more... )

September-October // The Closet

  • Nov. 8th, 2009 at 4:25 PM
Title: The Closet
Theme of the challenge: Fear in Broad Daylight

(There was something wrong. Something wrong with her closet.)

Super-late entry orz;; I never got the time (or the inspiration) to write but I took the chance of a longer deadline to submit one.

Fake-cut links to my writing journal. Sorry if I fake-cut all the time. I like organizing things in one place ;^^

Nov. 8th, 2009

  • 6:31 AM
Remember Love? )


****

I must say, not bad for a pilot episode. Thank you to everyone who contributed. :) Let's do another one next time, yeah? :)

The Poem written by many people

  • Nov. 6th, 2009 at 11:07 PM
The only rule is that you connect with the line that precedes you.

go.

Vipers' Tangle

  • Sep. 16th, 2009 at 2:32 AM

“You were not lying you liar.”

 

Powerful. Evocative. These are what I can tell of the novel of Francois Mauriac’s Vipers’ Tangle. Mainly, the story of the novel revolves around the character of a scarred old man who, almost all his life, has been living under misery, partly because of certain uncontrollable circumstances and partly because of his own decisions. That is to say, as people dislike Louis, out of spite, Louis, all the more, makes himself hateful to them. Now at sixty years old, when death seems to be looming over his shoulder, Louis decides to carry out his last attempt of revenge against the person who has hurt him the most, his wife Isa, by writing a letter to her to be supposedly opened after Louis’ death. The letter which Louis is writing, which is the story of the novel, eventually becomes Louis’ confession – his happiness, hurt, resentment and hope in life.

 

After reading the first page of the novel, I got so hooked with the story that I couldn’t put the book down. The story is sad, undeniably so. And the way the novel is written, as if we are reading the letter itself of Louis to his wife, makes the story somehow, personal in the sense that we are shared of the “secret” between Louis and Isa. (Though, we could also think of our reading the novel as a kind of intrusion to the privacy Louis and his wife. Nevertheless, whichever way you want to put it, reading the novel/letter becomes more interesting and intriguing.)

 

To a certain extent, one can say that this book is EMO. To prove my point, the above quote is just one of the many quotable lines we can observe in the book. However, Louis’ emo character has integrity and dignity.

 

This book is one of the few books that broke my heart. Read it!

Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window

  • Nov. 4th, 2009 at 7:48 PM
Shame on you if you haven't heard of Alfred Hitchcock, if not for this movie, then at least for his classic thriller "Psycho," which is most famous for the murder-at-the-shower scene.

For those of you Litmajors who studied the feminist Laura Mulvey's film criticism, then you might know "Rear Window," because it's a good example of visual scopophilia. I believe Sir Max mentioned this before in one of our former LitCrit 2 classes, so there.

Anyway, I recently finished the movie and can I say that it is certainly very amusing to watch, if only because it is set on the early 1950s New York and basically, the world as we know it is totally different from the world of L.B. Jefferies (James Stewart) and his socialite girlfriend Lisa Fremont (Grace Kelly).
I admit the film is a good instance of scopophilia because the first time Grace Kelly was shown, the camera was focused point-blank on her smiling, angelic face, and the shot must have lingered a few seconds too long. Her movements were dramatic and appealing, if only to show the smooth grace and feminine charm which every female is supposed to exude during her time.

Anyway, we're not here to discuss Mulvey's theory, so let me proceed to lighter judgment. :D

If you guys have watched "Disturbia," then you should watch "Rear Window," because if anything, the former copied the storyline of this 1954 classic. The premise is about professional photographer Jefferies, who is stuck at home with his left leg on a cast for several weeks. The extremely hot weather forces him and his neighbors to open their windows, and Jefferies, bored and with one week still left before his cast is removed, peers into the lives of his neighbors through their open windows. Some amusing things to look at are the sexy ballerina with the many suitors, Miss Lonelyhearts and her journey towards singlehood despite being past her prime, and the newlywed couple who are crazy for each other. However, one day, Jefferies catches one of his neighbors fighting with his invalid wife and the next day, with his invalid wife gone from bed and from the neigbor's life. Adding one suspicious action to another, Jefferies casts his doubts on this one neighbor and begins to think that he might have murdered his wife.

Sounds familiar? Well, that's because the movie "Disturbia" does not differ that heavily from this movie. However, I suggest you pay tribute to the original, especially because the last part of the movie is one of the most gripping scenes ever!

Though some references are hard to relate to (I mean this is 1950s America), and the manner of speaking quite different from the brash, informal ways of some flicks now, the movie is definitely not to miss, if not for its reel merits, then at least for knowing why the great stars of yesterday (like Grace Kelly) were such!

The Elephant Vanishes

  • Nov. 4th, 2009 at 7:15 PM
I am currently reading Haruki Murakami's The Elephant Vanishes, and for a light read, it doesn't fail all that much. I admit I am not so impressed by it, but a couple of stories shine, like "On Seeing the 100% Perfect Girl one Beautiful April Morning", "The Elephant Vanishes", "The Little Green Monster", "The Last Lawn of the Afternoon", and "Family Affair".

All the stories speak of the modern situation in which people try to perceive the world through rational, explainable processes. This collection of short stories challenges that notion. It plays with the idea of fantasy and wonder in the midst of economic and technological advancement. The stories always shows one major thing: what if an elephant suddenly vanishes without any reason? what if a monster suddenly appears one day in your house? what if there's no way to explain strong gusts of wind on a supposedly hot day? What if the slightest incident in your life has no explanation at all, would that cease to be real?

Hence, the collection is perfect for those people who like questioning the realness of reality. In the stories, fantasy is mingled with reality, and both are intricately bound that to dissect each story analytically and deductively would have been futile and beyond the point. The main point of the stories themselves, I believe, is presenting that alternate reality so fused with the reality of daily life that we people live in. My personal favorite is "On Seeing the 100% Perfect Girl One Beautiful April Morning" and "The Elephant Vanishes", because of the excellent way both stories relate to modern life.

However, the greatest feature of the collection also serves as its weak point. For one, after reading around five stories, there is a tendency of the theme becoming redudant, to the extent that only the givens or the specifics become different, but the theme and the storyline (even the pacing) the same. Basically, when you've read one, you've read them all.

Second, the stories can get really vague and obscure. I know that obscurity is one main point of the collection, but the vagueness becomes a little too vague to understand already. An example of this would be the story "Barn Burning," wherein I believe Murakami failed to establish the connection between the man who loves to burn barns and the woman who suddenly disappears. Or maybe this lack of connection is his entire point, but still this lack of connection should have been established as well. A few stories lack grounding, and so, at one point I felt like the story was no different from reading a blog entry posted by a random stranger.

Despite these flaws, though, I still suggest it overall, because the good apples in the basket outweigh, or at the very least, even out, the rotten ones. If you're a fan of this kind of subject matter, and you're too lazy to peruse Murakami's novels, then I highly suggest you read The Elephant Vanishes first, since the theme and writing style manifested in the novels are similar to his short stories. Before the sembreak draws to a close, it'll be good for you to see how Murakami wrote when he was still a budding writer in the Japanese literary scene.

November-December Topic

  • Nov. 2nd, 2009 at 9:47 PM

Hello all,


This is a post to inform you of the third topic for the writing competition, valid for the November-December period. I--as long as people I've interacted with recently--have been on the lookout for so many good movies coming out, so the next challenge is for you to

Write a story about the worst experience one can go through when watching a movie (as in the cinema). The story can include the time right before going inside the theater, once inside the theater, and after. torture your character/s as much as you want! The more creative, the better!

Again, the story can be less but not more than 1800 words. Here again is the format for posting:


 

Title
Theme of the challenge (Fear in Broad Daylight)
Brief summary or teaser of your story
 

Due date for entries is on Saturday, Wednesday, December 31, 2009


By the way, not too many people contributed to the September-October challenge. If you are still interested, you may catch up and still submit your entry for that bracket, but after December 31, the same due date for challenges for the November-December bracket, entries for both challenges will no longer be accepted, unless the rest of ExeCom say otherwise.


Looking forward to your entries and I promise to comment on the two entries for the September-October bracket soon!

First Trip to Earthsea

  • Nov. 1st, 2009 at 8:00 PM


In her introduction to Tales from Earthsea, Ursula K. Le Guin wrote,


"So these are the reports of my explorations and discoveries: tales from Earthsea for those who have liked or think they might like the place, and who are willing to accept these hypotheses:


          things change:
                    authors and wizards are not always to be trusted:
                              nobody can explain a dragon."


But this isn't about that book. Nope, this is actually about her other book, the first of the Earthsea cycle: A Wizard of Earthsea


To unravel )




Not a very good book review, I fear. I'm a bit rusty, not having written one in a while. All in all, however, I'd have to say I think the novel of discussion gets two-and-a-half stars from me. As for me, I do promise to write a better review next time!
 

Full Circle

  • Oct. 27th, 2009 at 10:43 PM

I usually refrain from writing end-of-semester posts, but because my last year in college turned out to be the farthest thing from what I expected it to be (not that I map-out my semesters beforehand, mind you), I think it is worth seeing in black-and-white.


This school year seems to want me to come full circle. I won't say I've changed myself overall for the better. It isn't so much me, but key circumstances around me which are looking more and more familiar. Last semester was freshman year once more: without the awkward makeup, the enthusiastic outfits, the first-year fears, the careless naivete.


I hung out with my block more: not too much, not too little, but just enough. Just enough to remember why I love having conversations with certain people, just enough to de-stress, just enough to know I was surrounded by people who were in more or less the same academic soup I was in (An alphabet soup, I suppose, each signifier a different form of resistance, a different hegemony, a different kind of sext).


I have not had a seven-thirty class in the morning since freshman year, and though I plan to find a way out of this timeslot, I still cannot help but draw a circle.


And perhaps because I had forgotten the rough edges of memory (Remember that not everything must be forgotten), rain flooded the veins of cities, and hearts, and minds, and all the secret little pathways we keep in the lines of our palms. In my first year of college, Nolledo and Saramago were my concerns: the electricity was cut-off, the wind howled about the house. After the initial assurances of being safe, the next concern was How are you going to do the paper? Paper, what paper, can you do a paper on Nolledo without understanding Nolledo? Can you explain the White Blindness and pour your heart out in the black and white of words when it is the black blindness of a storm that surrounds you?


Now the circumstances are different: more cunning, more dire. A cold slap on the face--there is no attempt to dramatize or romanticize, there is only the acknowledgment that without an apparent reason we (We, we, you, you, I, I) survived. Yesterday I heard my brother curse from the sala as I  was setting the table. He was upset and befuddled because my copy of Kafka's The Metamorphosis mysteriously got wet. A part of me was upset (though I decided not to confront him. Who needs extra stress?), and then I thought of Trina, and[info]azillusionizes, and Max Pulan: all the words that couldn't be saved, all the memories seeped in rain, smelling of dampness and the sweet cold of pulp. And later, I thought of the houses and the rafts and the hunger and the soul-eating desperation that prowled above and below the floodwater. And Kafka was okay, he was all right. I understood, and he understood, too.


My Lit 127.2 class will be held in CTC 302. I don't know about you (and I already told[info]keishinreverie this), but places hold more meaning to me now--far, far more meaning than letters and gift-wrappers and scented candles. Places of significance are instant pathways to my soul, because they envelop my whole being. CTC 302 was where the most magical (sabaw, green-minded, mind-fucking, academically-challenging, Lord I'm only in freshman year but I'm already failing because I'm lost in the garden of forking paths and the actuality and potentiality of the fucking mango seed is having a bitch fight with the way Shakespeare screwed the Aristotelian plot line over to give birth to Lear) moments happened, and I can't help but smile, I can't help but smile.


I don't know what second semester will be like. I do not want to know. I just want to take it as it unfolds(wings of a butterfly, of a Samsa-turned-beetle, of an ending hovering in the sky). Full circle, full circle, it wants me to come full circle.